Login
Thursday, September 09, 2010

LINEARIZED MULTISTAGE MODEL

 

The overstatement of added risks by potencies is made even worse when the potencies are not determined from the maximum likelihood estimate of the dose-response model but instead are inferred from upper bounds on the dose-response model.  The most common set of regulatory upper bounds is the linearized multistage model.  The linearized multistage model is not really a dose-response model at all; that is, it is not one curve fit to data.  Instead, the linearized multistage model is a set of upper bounds on the probabilities of the specified response at the different dose levels.  As suggested in Figure 4, the linearized multistage model upper-bound value on the risk at each dose corresponds to the largest added risk that can be obtained from any multistage model that can not be rejected as providing a fit that is too inferior relative to the fit of the MLE of the multistage model.  For most doses, the linearized multistage model upper-bound value at a dose corresponds to the largest added risk that can be obtained by making the linear term in the multistage models as large as possible.  Usually the linear term in the multistage model is denoted by q1 and the much larger values in the linearized multistage model at low doses are denoted by q1*.  The linearized multistage models q1* upper bound on the slope of the extra risk is the potency most often used to overstate the added risks implied by the multistage dose-response model (Figure 5).

 

>> Figure 4

>> Figure 5

3. Human Health Risk Assessment
3.1     
Quantitative Risk Assessment and Statistical Analysis
3.2      Importance of Dose and Dose-Response Relationships
3.3      Misuse of Regulatory Upper-Bound Risk Characterizations
3.4      Risk Characterization Choices and Risk Exaggeration
3.5      A Better Approach to Cancer Risk Characterization
3.6      Overview of Background, Motivation, and Statistical Methods for Margin-of-Exposure Characterizations of Cancer Risks
           3.6.1    Importance of Dose
           3.6.2    Dose-Response Modeling
           3.6.3    Dose-Response Models
           3.6.4    Maximum Likelihood Estimation
           3.6.5    
Multistage Model
           3.6.6    Example of Fitted Multistage Model
           3.6.7    Potency
           3.6.8    Linearized Multistage Model
           3.6.9    Overstatement of Risks by the Linearized Multistage Model
           3.6.10  Adverse Impacts of the Variability in the Magnitude of the Bias in the Linearized Multistage Model's Overstatement of Risks
           3.6.11  Non-Responsiveness of the Linearized Multistage Model to Data
           3.6.12  Ranking Relative Risks
           3.6.13  Added Risk versus Extra Risk
           3.6.14  Need for a Better Dose-Response Characterization
           3.6.15  Better Dose-Response Characterization
           3.6.16  Benchmark Doses
           3.6.17  Responsiveness of Benchmark Doses Data Versus the Relative Non-Responsiveness of the Regulatory Upper-Bound Potency Q1* based on the Linearized Multistage Model
           3.6.18  Recommended Dose-Response Characterization
           3.6.19  Margin-of-Exposure Characterizations
           3.6.20  Conclusion
           3.6.21  Figures 1 to 16
3.7      Innovative Risk Assessment
3.8      Components of High-to-Low-Dose Extrapolation and Dose-Response Modeling
3.9      Probabilistic Exposure Assessment
3.10    Aggregate Risk Assessment
3.11    Cumulative Risk Assessment
3.12    Example Activities